The New England Journal of Medicine -- June 10, 1999 -- Vol. 340, No. 23
David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D., U.S. Surgeon General
Editorial
In his historic 1964 report, Surgeon General Luther Terry concluded that
"cigarette smoking is a health hazard of sufficient importance in the
United States to warrant appropriate remedial action." Time and again since
1964, however, we have had to address additional threats to health from
other tobacco products.
In the late 1960s, the major cigarette manufacturers introduced and widely
promoted little cigars. Even though they were indistinguishable in
appearance from standard filter cigarettes, they were exempt from the
congressional ban on radio and television advertisements for cigarettes
because their wrapping was made of tobacco, not paper. Consumption of
little cigars increased dramatically. The next tobacco problem was
smokeless tobacco. After the mass marketing of cigarettes began, smokeless
tobacco had steadily declined in popularity. This trend changed in the
mid-1980s, however, with the intensive marketing of a new form of smokeless
tobacco called moist snuff, which was sold under such brand names as Skoal,
Skoal Bandit, and Copenhagen. Consumption increased, particularly among
young men and adolescent boys.
The effects on health of both little cigars and smokeless tobacco were
quickly studied. My predecessors as surgeon general issued reports
examining little cigars in 1973 and smokeless tobacco in 1986; they
concluded that each product promoted cancer. Shortly after each report,
Congress banned television and radio advertising of the products; in the
case of smokeless tobacco, it also required health-related warning labels.
Cigars pose the most recent challenge. Between 1993 and 1998, sales of
cigars in the United States increased by 50%. This increase was
almost exclusively due to the rising sales of large cigars, which increased
75%, from 2.14 billion cigars in 1993 to 3.75 billion in 1998.
Earlier this year, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of
Health and Human Services released two reports describing the widespread
use of cigars, especially relatively cheap, machine-made cigars, among
teenagers. Even in California, which has led the nation in reducing
cigarette consumption, the percentage of men currently smoking cigars
increased from 4.8% in 1990 to 8.8% in 1996. This
corresponded to an unprecedented increase in promotional and
product-placement advertisements for cigars in magazines, movies, and music
videos. By comparison, cigarette consumption declined by 3%
nationally over the same period. The increase in cigar smoking has taken
place largely among relatively well educated people, who have traditionally
eschewed cigarettes.
In 1998, in a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence on cigar
smoking, the National Cancer Institute concluded that cigar smoking can
cause oral, esophageal, laryngeal, and lung cancer. Regular cigar smokers
who inhale, particularly those who smoke several cigars daily, have an
increased risk of both coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive lung
disease.
The report by Iribarren and colleagues in this issue of the Journal adds to
the strong evidence that cigar smoking can have many adverse effects on
health. In a study involving a cohort of nearly 18,000 men enrolled in the
Kaiser Permanente health plan, including 1,546 cigar smokers, and several
decades of follow-up, they found that, "independently of other risk
factors, regular cigar smoking can increase the risk of coronary heart
disease, COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease], and cancers of the
upper aerodigestive tract and lung." Iribarren et al. also found a possible
synergistic effect of cigar smoking and alcohol consumption in terms of
oropharyngeal cancers and cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Although such a relation has been documented for cigarette smoking, this is
one of the first studies to demonstrate that the relation may also exist
for cigars. Thus, the popularity of cigar bars where both cigar smoking
and alcohol consumption are encouraged arouses special concern with respect
to the public health.
What is the proper response of the public health community to the increase
in cigar use in the United States? As a general guiding principle,
restrictions on the sale of cigars (through the setting of excise-tax
rates, for example) ought to be at least as stringent as those currently
applied to other tobacco products. The current federal tax on large cigars
is a maximum of 3 cents per cigar, which is considerably lower than the
federal tax on cigarettes. It is critical that cigars not be construed as a
safe or less costly alternative to cigarettes.
Cigars should carry warning labels similar to those now required on all
cigarettes and smokeless-tobacco products. Cigar smokers should understand
the increased risks of cancer and cardiovascular disease that are linked to
cigar smoking. Equally important, people who do not smoke need to be
informed that the passive smoke from cigars is toxic. Health warnings
should appear not only on the product itself but also in all advertisements
and promotional materials.
Manufacturers of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco are required by federal
law to report annually to the Department of Health and Human Services all
ingredients added to tobacco in their products. Cigar manufacturers should
be required to do the same. Congress should lift arbitrary statutory
restrictions on the disclosure of such information to the public. Such
action would facilitate research and help educate consumers about the
chemicals added to cigars as well as to other tobacco products. In
addition, an accurate testing procedure should be developed to determine
levels of tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide, and other harmful constituents in
cigars. Tobacco smoke contains some 4,000 different substances, including
about 60 that are known carcinogens. Information about the contents of
tobacco smoke should also be routinely made public.
We must do a better job of educating the public, especially children and
adolescents, about the risks to health associated with cigar smoking. We
also need strong federal and state enforcement of existing tobacco-control
laws that will make it as difficult for minors to purchase cigars as to buy
cigarettes. This goal can be achieved, and lives can be saved. However, the
states must allocate funds for effective tobacco-control programs from
their multibillion-dollar settlement with the tobacco industry.
Establishing such programs could well represent the most important public
health initiative of the late 20th century.
Tobacco -- including tobacco in cigars -- is hazardous not only to the
health of those who use it, but also to society. Tobacco use increases the
risk of premature death and preventable illness for the user, and
nonsmokers who inhale toxic smoke -- from a cigar or cigarette -- can have
an increased risk of premature death and preventable illness. Passive
smoking also contributes to respiratory and related illnesses in children
and fetuses.
As we approach the new millennium, historians will record that we had the
chance to eliminate tobacco as the nation's leading cause of preventable
illness and premature death. It is time for government, the public health
community, and parents and families to accept the challenge of making
smoking history.